To read endnotes, click on the the note number, then click on the to return to your place in the text.
Once there was a small boy who wanted a pair of skates. His
parents, hoping to teach him the value of money, informed him
that he would have to save the required amount from his
allowance. His mother overheard him in his room one afternoon
shaking his bank and counting his money. Then she heard the bell
on the ice cream wagon ringing loudly in the street outside. Mom
waited to see what would happen. The boy wanted the skates, but
he also liked ice cream. There was no sound from the room until
the vehicle had gone, and the bell could no longer be heard.
Then a childish voice was heard in prayer. "Dear Jesus, please
don't let the ice cream wagon come down my street anymore."(2)
David Bersoff teaches Social Psychology at the University of
Pennsylvania and has a particular interest in why supposedly
"good" people do bad things. An article appeared in newspapers
around the country this past week (on Ash Wednesday, as a matter
of fact)(3) describing soon-to-be-published research exploring the
kind of rationalizations used to justify such common trespasses
as pilfering offices supplies or quietly pocketing a cashier's
overpayment. People are more likely to give in to temptation
when they can remain passive, the study finds, and when they feel
no one is being harmed.
In his research to be published in Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, Bersoff had University students take part in
what they were led to believe was a product test. The
participants were then overpaid $2.00 for their efforts.
The first group was told a big foreign company was
sponsoring the test. The subjects were paid by an impersonal
cashier. In that group, 80 percent kept the extra money. The
next group were told the test was being run by a graduate student
and being paid for out of his own funds. "Now the victim has a
face. It's harder to deny harm," said Bersoff. Half of that
group accepted the undeserved money.
In the next scenario, the cashier counted out the money on
her desk, then asked, "Is that right?" The question made it
necessary to tell a lie to get the undeserved $2.00. Forty
percent did. In the final scenario, subjects were told a
graduate student was paying for the test, and the cashier asked
if the payment was right. So there was a victim to hurt and a
lie required. Still 20 percent took the extra $2.00.
Bersoff said in all cases, it was the same $2.00, but one
complication and then two made it harder and harder to "find in
your mind a way to justify this." He went on, "I don't believe
people are bad, but certain situations play on their weakness and
lead them to do bad things. I think that is the whole nature of
temptation."
Interesting. Temptation is all around us, isn't it? No
doubt that is why every year, on this first Sunday in Lent, this
unique period in the church year during which we are called to a
rigorous self-examination, the church reads again the story of
Christ's temptation in the wilderness.
Our story from Luke this morning is the classic New
Testament account of temptation (the Old Testament classic being
the serpent and Eve in the Garden of Eden). As the lesson has
it, Jesus is "led by the Spirit" into the wilderness where he
encounters the devil.
Immediately, modern readers have a problem. We try to
picture the scene - no problem with the rocks and shrubs of the
desert, no problem with Jesus (we see him more or less as
portrayed in the pictures on Sunday School folders), but what to
do with the devil? That little guy in the red outfit with horns
and a pitchfork tail that we see on Halloween? Scary? Not
really. "Show a picture of the devil in a red suit to a child
and do they recoil in horror? No. Chances are, they might get
him confused with Santa Claus."(4) In fact, the biblical picture
is not definitive at all. The New Testament sometimes speaks of
the devil with human analogies: he is a "ruler" (John 12:31), a
"murderer" (John 8:44), "the evil one" (John 17:15), the "enemy"
(Matt. 12:39). But we also find animal images - a roaring lion
(I Pet. 5:8), a serpent (Rev. 12:17), a dragon (Rev. 12:9). So
how do we form our picture? Calvin warns that "it did not befit
the Holy Spirit to feed our curiosity" and that we ought not to
"linger over superfluous matters" in this area.(5) OK.
As one writer has noted, "Part of our problem with the story
of Jesus' temptation in the wilderness is just this inability to
picture the devil as anything that is all that menacing. Someone
once wrote that this was perhaps his greatest triumph in our
time: that no one believes in him."(6)
It may well be true that folks are less willing to believe
in one supernatural source of evil than in generations past, but
the fact that evil exists is beyond question. What is the source
of that repressed rage, blood lust and violence deep within every
one of us which ordinarily surfaces only in our dreams when we
cannot control our innermost feelings and desires? Why is it
that some decent people, some of them Bible-reading, church-going
Christians, can become vicious beasts when they confront Jews or
blacks or frightened women trying to make their way into an
abortion clinic? Why do otherwise compassionate human beings
stand aside and let fellow human beings suffer from the brutality
of others? Why do good people and good governments allow the
world to be divided into the affluent few and the starving many?(7)
The answer is that there is EVIL out there that is beyond the
action or inaction of individuals.
A biologist by the name of Lyall Watson has written a book
called Dark Nature(8) in which he discusses an idea which suggests
that just as genes are the units which transmit biological
characteristics from one generation to the next, so also there
may be "memes." The theory says memes are units of transmission
of culture, and they are spread between us by being caught, by
leaping from brain to brain. They are ideas. Memes are like
cultural viruses which affect us all. They may be such things as
catchy tunes which everybody finds themselves humming, or catchy
phrases, or crazes in fashions, or ways of playing games, or
following pop stars, or whatever.
The trouble is, successful memes do not have to be nice,
they just have to be catchy. So religion could be a successful
meme. We are told Christianity has to be caught rather than
taught, so that sounds like it could be a meme. But Klan
violence, or random mayhem in angry crowds, or anti-Semitism, or
vandalism could be equally successful memes. Watson goes on to
suggest there may be already enough bad news in the air to infect
anyone, anywhere, at anytime.
The theological way of describing that phenomenon is called
Original Sin. As the Council of Trent in 1546 said, the sin of
Adam "is one in origin and is passed on by propagation not by
imitation." In other words, we do not have to do anything. We
are all infected by it, simply because we live.(9) So biology and
theology agree. Isn't THAT good news?
In a way that might be handy. If evil is all around us, if
it infects us like a vicious virus, if it's taint is unavoidable,
then we have an excuse. We cannot help it. It is not our fault.
"The DEVIL made me do it," to borrow the old Flip Wilson line.
But suddenly we are confronted by these temptations of Jesus and
are brought up short.
Look at them for a moment - not particularly awful, are
they? There are no enticements to ill-gotten gains or incredible
debauchery. No inducement to slaughter Romans or assassinate
Caesar (or even to bomb Baghdad or kill Saddam, for that matter).
No interns to be added to the band of disciples. If this devil
were really evil, why not tempt Jesus to do some of the things we
read and hear about every day?
Still, the three temptations presented are strong, and
everyone of them is based on truth (which is a wonderful reminder
about how the truth can be used for evil purposes). Jesus, you
are incredibly powerful; use that power to meet your own needs.
If you do not take care of yourself, you will not be able to take
care of anyone else. On top of that, if word gets around that
you turn stones into bread, think how many folks would follow
you. Everyone can use a little extra bread. Who could have
blamed Jesus for doing something like that?
The second temptation was equally enticing. Let folks know
beyond the shadow of a doubt that YOU ARE THE MESSIAH, the Chosen
One of God. What a spectacular stunt to leap from the Pinnacle
of the Temple, drop the 450 feet straight down into the Kidron
Valley, and land unharmed. God's angels will protect you.
People will SURELY listen to your message when they hear what you
have done. Would anyone legitimately reproach Jesus for deciding
to take that course?
The third temptation was enormous - unchallenged political
power to right all the wrongs...all the kingdoms of the world.
How incredibly simple, Jesus: you can ORDER folks to listen. You
can ORDER justice and an end to all oppression. What a wonderful
opportunity! All it will take is a tiny compromise, an ever-so-slight division in your loyalties. You do not have to stop
worshiping the God of heaven, just spread that worship around a
bit. Jesus, this is the offer you cannot refuse. Who could have
blamed him for accepting?
The three temptations of Christ. No doubt there were more.
It is hard to imagine that ten years have gone by since Martin
Scorcese's film The Last Temptation of Christ was released. The
furor was incredible. People were horrified that the camera
would suggest that Jesus had sexual thoughts or could harbor
notions of abandoning his mission or have fantasies about
marrying Mary Magdelene and settling down. There were marches
and demonstrations. One Sunday, as the congregation was filing
out after the 11:00 o'clock service, a well-dressed young man
came to the church door obviously looking to speak with me. In
his hand he held a petition and a plan of action for me to use to
help prevent the distribution or showing of The Last Temptation
of Christ. I said, "Thanks, but no thanks." I had not seen the
film and would not condemn it on the basis of hearsay evidence.
I would make my OWN decision after seeing it. He asked, "Do you
want to SEE it?" I said, "Of course." I finally did see it
(after it came out on video - I'm cheap). For the most part the
movie struck me as silly, but, in it's own silly way, it did
reaffirm the truth of scripture where we read, "He was in all
points tempted like as we are, yet without sin" (Heb. 4:15).
I am intrigued at the way Jesus avoided giving in.
Scripture. After each of the temptations was offered, he quoted
scripture. Perhaps that should not be surprising. After all,
spiritual maturity only comes when we have a deep relationship
with the God of all the universe whom we meet and learn from in
the pages of the Book.
Is that the answer to overcoming temptation? Know all the
scripture you can? Well, that would not hurt, but...
Unfortunately, a huge red flag is raised at the end of the
lesson. Did you hear it? Verse 13: "When the devil had finished
every test, he departed from him until an opportune time." In
other words, this struggle with temptation is ongoing...for
Jesus, and most certainly for you and me. Isn't THAT good news?
No. Of course not. But there IS good news here. As we
begin our Lenten pilgrimage, this unique period during which we
are called to self-examination, we can note that the temptations
we encounter are not new. Indeed, they are common to us all.
Memes, for lack of a better word. Yes, there WILL be wilderness
journeys - times when we experience physical or emotional hunger,
times when we are tired of being ignored and wish someone would
notice us, times when we are frustrated at not being able to make
a difference in our own life or anyone else's - the same
temptations that Jesus felt. The message is BE CAREFUL ABOUT
SETTLING FOR THE EASY WAY OUT. It may be nothing short of evil.
Yes, there is evil in the world, and yes, we are always in
danger of being caught in its snare. But we know one thing more,
and this one thing is the most important of all: "Neither death,
nor life, nor angels, nor rulers, nor things present, nor things
to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor anything else in
all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in
Christ Jesus our Lord." (Rom. 8:38-39).
1. James S. Hewett, Illustrations Unlimited (Wheaton: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc,
1988), p. 477 2. Dr. Eugene Brice quoted by Ken Waddell, "Sermonshop 1998 03 01," #21, 2/24/98 3. Mary Otto, "Temptation Science," Knight-Ridder Syndicate, 2/25/98 4. Rob Elder, "Biding His Time," The Clergy Journal, May/June 1997, p. 91 5. Institutes, 1.14.15 6. Elder, ibid. 7. "The Problem of a Personal Devil and Demons," Study Paper of the 115th General
Assembly, Presbyterian Church (US) 8. Hodder & Stoughton, 1995. ISBN: 0-340-61787-X 9. Janice Scott, "The Nature of Temptation," www.eatonparish.com/lent1.htm
Amen!

click and send us mail