Chapter 2:
| Darby
| Geneva
| Gill
| Jamieson Faussett Brown
| Matthew Henry
| Matthew Henry Concise
| Wesley
| Index
| Bible Gateway |
Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ezekiel Hosea
Daniel 2
Complete Concise
It was said (1:17) that Daniel had understanding in dreams; and
here we have an early and eminent instance of it, which soon made him famous in
the court of Babylon, as Joseph by the same means came to be so in the court of
Egypt. This chapter is a history, but it is the history of a prophecy, by a
dream and the interpretation of it. Pharaoh's dream, and Joseph's
interpretation of it, related only to the years of plenty and famine and the
interest of God's Israel in them; but Nebuchadnezzar's dream here, and
Daniel's interpretation of that, look much higher, to the four monarchies, and
the concerns of Israel in them, and the kingdom of the Messiah, which should be
set up in the world upon the ruins of them. In this chapter we have, I. The
great perplexity that Nebuchadnezzar was put into by a dream which he had
forgotten, and his command to the magicians to tell him what it was, which they
could not pretend to do (v. 1-11). II. Orders given for the destroying of all
the wise men of Babylon, and of Daniel among the rest, with his fellows (v. 12-15).
III. The discovery of this secret to him, in answer to prayer, and the
thanksgiving he offered up to God thereupon (v. 16-23). IV. His admission to
the king, and the discovery he made to him both of his dream and of the
interpretation of it (v. 24-45). V. The great honour which Nebuchadnezzar put
upon Daniel, in recompence for this service, and the preferment of his
companions with him (v. 46-49).
Verses 1-13
We meet with a great difficulty in the date of this story; it is
said to be in the second year of the reign of Nebuchadnezzar, v. 1. Now Daniel
was carried to Babylon in his first year, and, it should seem, he was three
years under tutors and governors before he was presented to the king, ch. 1:5.
How then could this happen in
the second year? Perhaps, though three
years were appointed for the education of other children, yet Daniel was so
forward that he was taken into business when he had been but one year at school,
and so in the second year he became thus considerable. Some make it to be the
second year after he began to reign alone, but the fifth or sixth year since he
began to reign in partnership with his
father. Some read it,
and in
the second year, (the second after Daniel and his fellows stood before the
king),
in the kingdom of Nebuchadnezzar, or
in his reign, this
happened; as Joseph, in the second year after his skill in dreams, showed and
expounded Pharaoh's, so Daniel, in the second year after he commenced master
in that art, did this service. I would much rather take it some of these ways
than suppose, as some do, that it was in the second year after he had conquered
Egypt, which was the thirty-sixth year of his reign, because it appears by what
we meet with in Ezekiel, that Daniel was famous both for wisdom and prevalence
in prayer long before that; and therefore this passage, or story, which shows
how he came to be so eminent for both these must be laid early in Nebuchadnezzar's
reign. Now here we may observe,
I. The perplexity that Nebuchadnezzar was in by reason of a
dream which he had dreamed but had forgotten (v. 1):
He dreamed dreams,
that is, a dream consisting of divers distinct parts, or which filled his head
as much as if it had been many dreams. Solomon speaks of a
multitude of
dreams, strangely incoherent, in which
there are divers vanities,
Eccl. 5:7. This dream of Nebuchadnezzar's had nothing in the thing itself but
what might be paralleled in many a common dream, in which are often represented
to men things as foreign as are here mentioned; but there was something in the
impression it made upon him which carried with it an incontestable evidence of
its divine original and its prophetic significancy. Note, The greatest of men
are not exempt from, nay, they lie most open to, those cares and troubles of
mind which disturb their repose in the night, while
the sleep of the
labouring man is sweet and sound, and the sleep of the sober temperate man
free from confused dreams. The abundance of the rich will not suffer them to
sleep at all for care, and the excesses of gluttons and drunkards will not
suffer them to sleep quietly for dreaming. But this recorded here was not from
natural causes. Nebuchadnezzar was a troubler of God's Israel, but God here
troubled him; for he that made the soul can
make his sword to approach to it.
He had his guards about him, but they could not keep trouble from his spirit. We
know not the uneasiness of many that live in great pomp, and, one would think,
in pleasure, too. We look into their houses, and are tempted to envy them; but,
could we look into their hearts, we should pity them rather. All the treasures
and all the delights of the children of men, which this mighty monarch had
command of, could not procure him a little repose, when by reason of the trouble
of his mind his
sleep broke from him. But God
gives his beloved sleep,
who return to him as their rest.
II. The trial that he made of his magicians and astrologers
whether they could tell him what his dream was, which he had forgotten. They
were immediately sent for, to
show the king his dreams, v. 2. There are
many things which we retain the impressions of, and yet have lost the images of
the things; though we cannot tell what the matter was, we know how we were
affected with it; so it was with this king. His dream had slipped out of his
mind, and he could not possibly recollect it, but he was confident he should
know it if he heard it again. God ordered it so that Daniel might have the more
honour, and, in him, the God of Daniel. Note, God sometimes serves his own
purposes by putting things out of men's minds as well as by putting things
into their minds. The magicians, it is likely, were proud of their being sent
for into the king's bed-chamber, to give him a taste of their office, not
doubting but it would be for their honour. He tells them that he had
dreamed
a dream, v. 3. They speak to him in the Syriac tongue, which was then the
same with the Chaldee, but now they differ much. And henceforward Daniel uses
that language, or dialect of the Hebrew, for the same reason that those words,
Jer. 10:11, are in that language because designed to convince the Chaldeans of
the folly of their idolatry and to bring them to the knowledge and worship of
the true and living God, which the stories of these chapters have a direct
tendency to. But ch. 8 and forward, being intended for the comfort of the Jews,
is written in their peculiar language. They, in their answer, complimented the
king with their good wishes, desired him to tell his dream, and undertook with
all possible assurance to interpret it, v. 4. But the king insisted upon it that
they must tell him the dream itself, because he had forgotten it and could not
tell it to them. And, if they could not do this, they should all be put to death
as deceivers (v. 5), themselves
cut to pieces and
their houses made a
dunghill. If they could, they should be rewarded and preferred, v. 6. And
they knew, as Balaam did concerning Balak, that he was able to
promote them
to great honour, and give them that
wages of unrighteousness which,
like him,
they loved so dearly. No question therefore that they will do
their utmost to gratify the king; if they do not, it is not for want of
good-will, but for want of power, Providence so ordering it that the magicians
of Babylon might now be as much confounded and put to shame as of old the
magicians of Egypt had been, that, how much soever his people were both in Egypt
and Babylon vilified and made contemptible, his oracles might in both be
magnified and made honourable, by the silencing of those that set up in
competition with them. The magicians, having reason on their side, insist upon
it that the king must tell them the dream, and then, if they do not tell him the
interpretation of it, it is their fault, v. 7. But arbitrary power is deaf to
reason. The king falls into a passion, gives them hard words, and, without any
colour of reason, suspects that they could tell him but would not; and instead
of upbraiding them with impotency, and the deficiency of their art, as he might
justly have done, he charges them with a combination to affront him:
You have
prepared lying and corrupt words to speak before me. How unreasonable and
absurd is this imputation! If they had undertaken to tell him what his dream
was, and had imposed upon him with a sham, he might have charged them with lying
and corrupt words; but to say this of them when they honestly confessed their
own weakness only shows what senseless things indulged passions are, and how apt
great men are to think it is their prerogative to pursue their humour in
defiance of reason and equity, and all the dictates of both. When the magicians
begged of him to tell them the dream, though the request was highly rational and
just, he tells them that they did but dally with him, to gain time (v. 8),
till
the time be changed (v. 9), either till the king's desire to know his
dream be over, and he grown indifferent whether he be told it or no, though now
he is so hot upon it, or till they may hope he has so perfectly forgotten his
dream (the remaining shades of which are slipping from him apace as he catches
at them) that they may tell him what they please and make him believe it was his
dream, and, when the thing which is going, is quite
gone from him, as it
will be in a little time, he will not be able to disprove them. And therefore,
without delay, they must tell him the dream. In vain do they plead, 1. That
there is
no man on earth that can retrieve the king's dream, v. 10.
There are settled rules by which to discover what the meaning of the dream was;
whether they will hold or no is the question. But never were any rules offered
to be given by which to discover what the dream was; they cannot work unless
they have something to work upon. They acknowledge that the gods may indeed
declare
unto man what is his thought (Amos 4:13), for God
understands our
thoughts afar off (Ps. 139:2), what they will be before we think them, what
they are when we do not regard them, what they have been when we have forgotten
them. But those who can do this are gods, that
have not their dwelling with
flesh (v. 11), and it is they alone that can do this. As for men, their
dwelling
is with flesh; the wisest and greatest of men are clouded with a veil of
flesh, which quite obstructs and confounds all their acquaintance with spirit,
and their powers and operations; but the gods, that are themselves pure spirit,
know what is in man. See here an instance of the ignorance of these magicians,
that they speak of many gods, whereas there is but one and can be but one
infinite; yet see their knowledge of that which even the light of nature teaches
and the works of nature prove, that there is a God, who is a Spirit, and
perfectly knows the spirits of men and all their thoughts, so as it is not
possible that any man should. This confession of the divine omniscience is here
extorted from these idolaters, to the honour of God and their own condemnation,
who though they knew there is a God in heaven,
to whom all hearts are open,
all desires known, and from whom no secret is hid, yet offered up their
prayers and praises to dumb idols, that have
eyes and see not, ears and hear
not. 2. That there is no king on earth that would expect or require such a
thing, v. 10. This intimates that they were
kings, lords, and
potentates,
not ordinary people, that the magicians had most dealings with, and at whose
devotion they were, while the oracles of God and the gospel of Christ are
dispensed
to the poor. Kings and potentates have often required
unreasonable things of their subjects, but they think that never any required so
unreasonable a thing as this, and therefore hope his imperial majesty will not
insist upon it. But it is all in vain; when passion is in the throne reason is
under foot: He was
angry and very furious, v. 12. Note, It is very common
for those that will not be convinced by reason to be provoked and exasperated by
it, and to push on with fury what they cannot support with equity.
III. The doom passed upon all the magicians of Babylon. There is
but
one decree for them all (v. 9); they all stand condemned without
exception or distinction. The decree has gone forth, they must every man of them
be slain (v. 13), Daniel and his fellows (though they knew nothing of the
matter) not excepted. See here, 1. What are commonly the unjust proceedings of
arbitrary power. Nebuchadnezzar is here a tyrant in true colours, speaking death
when he cannot speak sense, and treating those as traitors whose only fault is
that they would serve him, but cannot. 2. What is commonly the just punishment
of pretenders. How unrighteous soever Nebuchadnezzar was in this sentence, as to
the ringleaders in the imposture, God was righteous. Those that imposed upon
men, in pretending to do what they could not do, are now sentenced to death for
not being able to do what they did not pretend to.
Verses 14-23
When the king sent for his wise men to tell them his dream, and
the interpretation of it (v. 2), Daniel, it seems, was not summoned to appear
among them; the king, though he was highly pleased with him when he examined
him, and thought him
ten times wiser than the rest of his wise men, yet
forgot him when he had most occasion for him; and no wonder, when all was done
in a heat, and nothing with a cool and deliberate thought. But Providence so
ordered it; that the magicians being nonplussed might be the more taken notice
of, and so the more glory might redound to the God of Daniel. But, though Daniel
had not the honour to be consulted with the rest of the wise men, contrary to
all law and justice, by an undistinguishing sentence, he stands condemned with
them, and till he has notice brought him to prepare for execution he knows
nothing of the matter. How miserable is the case of those who live under
arbitrary government, as this of Nebuchadnezzar's! How happy are we, whose
lives are under the protection of the law and methods of justice, and lie not
thus at the mercy of a peevish and capricious prince!
We have found already, in Ezekiel, that Daniel was famous both
for prudence and prayer; as a prince he had power with God and by man; by prayer
he had power with God, by prudence he had power with man, and in both he
prevailed. Thus did he
find favour and good understanding in the sight of
both, and in these verses we have a remarkable instance of both.
I. Daniel by prudence knew how to deal with men, and he
prevailed with them. When
Arioch, the captain of the guard, that was
appointed to slay all the wise men of Babylon, the whole college of them, seized
Daniel (for the sword of tyranny, like the sword of war,
devours one as well
as another), he
answered with counsel and wisdom (v. 14); he did not
fall into a passion, and reproach the king as unjust and barbarous, much less
did he contrive how to make resistance, but mildly asked,
Why is the decree
so hasty? v. 15. And whereas the rest of the wise men had insisted upon it
that it was utterly impossible for him ever to have his demand gratified, which
did but make him more outrageous, Daniel undertakes, if he may but have a little
time allowed him, to give the king all the satisfaction he desired, v. 16. The
king, being now sensible of his error in not sending for Daniel sooner, whose
character he began to recollect, was soon prevailed upon to respite the
judgment, and make trial of Daniel. Note, The likeliest method to turn away
wrath, even the wrath of a king, which is as the messenger of death, is by a
soft
answer, by that yielding which
pacifies great offences; thus, though
where
the word of a king is there is power, yet even that word may be repelled,
and that so as to be repealed; and so some read it here (v. 14):
Then Daniel
returned, and stayed
the counsel and edict, through Arioch, the king's
provostmarshal.
II. Daniel knew how by prayer to converse with God, and he found
favour with him, both in petition and in thanksgiving, which are the two
principal parts of prayer. Observe,
1. His humble petition for this mercy, that God would discover
to him what was the king's dream, and the interpretation of it. When he had
gained time he did not go to consult with the rest of the wise men whether there
was anything in their art, in their books, that might be of use in this matter,
but
went to his house, there to be alone with God, for from him alone,
who is the Father of lights, he expected this great gift. Observe, (1.) He did
not only pray for this discovery himself, but he engaged his companions to pray
for it too. He
made the thing known to those who had been all along his
bosom-friends and associates, requesting
that they would desire mercy of God
concerning this secret, v. 17, 18. Though Daniel was probably their senior,
and every way excelled them, yet he engaged them as partners with him in this
matter,
Vis unita fortiorThe union of forces produces greater force.
See Esth. 4:16. Note, Praying friends are valuable friends; it is good to have
an intimacy with and an interest in those that have fellowship with God and an
interest at the throne of grace; and it well becomes the greatest and best of
men to desire the assistance of the prayers of others for them. St. Paul often
entreats his friends to pray for him. Thus we must show that we put a value upon
our friends, upon prayer, upon their prayers. (2.) He was particular in this
prayer, but had an eye to, and a dependence upon, the general mercy of God:
That
they would desire the mercies of the God of heaven concerning this secret,
v. 18. We ought in prayer to look up to God as the
God of heaven, a God
above us, and who has dominion over us, to whom we owe adoration and allegiance,
a God of power, who can do everything. Our savior has taught us to pray to God
as
our Father in heaven. And, whatever good we pray for, our dependence
must be upon the
mercies of God for it, and an interest in those mercies
we must desire; we can expect nothing by way of recompence for our merits, but
all as the gift of God's mercies. They desired mercy
concerning this
secret. Note, Whatever is the matter of our care must be the matter of our
prayer; we must desire mercy of God concerning this thing and the other thing
that occasions us trouble and fear. God gives us leave to be humbly free with
him, and in prayer to enter into the detail of our wants and burdens.
Secret
things belong to the Lord our God, and therefore, if there be any mercy we
stand in need of that concerns a secret, to him we must apply; and, though we
cannot in faith pray for miracles, yet we may in faith pray to him who has all
hearts in his hand, and who in his providence does wonders without miracles, for
the discovery of that which is out of our view and the obtaining of that which
is out of our reach, as far as is for his glory and our good, believing that to
him nothing is hidden, nothing is hard. (3.) Their plea with God was the
imminent peril they were in; they desired mercy of God in this matter, that so
Daniel and his
fellows might not perish with the rest of the wise men of
Babylon, that the righteous might not be destroyed with the wicked. Note,
When the lives of good and useful men are in danger it is time to be earnest
with God for mercy for them, as for Peter in prison, Acts 12:5. (4.) The mercy
which Daniel and his fellows prayed for was bestowed. The
secret was revealed
unto Daniel in a
night-vision, v. 19. Some think he dreamed the same
dream, when he was asleep, that Nebuchadnezzar had dreamed; it should rather
seem that when he was awake, and continuing
instant in prayer, and
watching
in the same, the dream itself, and the interpretation of it, were
communicated to him by the ministry of an angel, abundantly to his satisfaction.
Note, The
effectual fervent prayer of righteous men avails much. There
are mysteries and secrets which by prayer we are let into; with that key the
cabinets of heaven are unlocked, for Christ has said, Thus
knock, and it
shall be opened unto you.
2. His grateful thanksgiving for this mercy when he had received
it:
Then Daniel blessed the God of heaven, v. 19. He did not stay till he
had told it to the king, and seen whether he would own it to be his dream or no,
but was confident that it was so, and that he had gained his point, and
therefore he immediately turned his prayers into praises. As he had prayed in a
full assurance that God would do this for him, so he gave thanks in a full
assurance that he had done it; and in both he had an eye to God as the
God of
heaven. His prayer was not recorded, but his thanksgiving is. Observe,
(1.) The honour he gives to God in this thanksgiving, which he
studies to do in a great variety and copiousness of expression:
Blessed be
the name of God for ever and ever. There is that
for ever in God
which is to be blessed and praised; it is unchangeably and eternally in him. And
it is to be blessed
for ever and ever; as the matter of praise is God's
eternal perfection, so the work of praise shall be everlastingly in the doing.
[1.] He gives to God the glory of what he is in himself:
Wisdom and might are
his, wisdom and courage (so some); whatever is fit to be done he will do;
whatever he will do he can do, he dares do, and he will be sure to do it in the
best manner, for he has infinite wisdom to design and contrive and infinite
power to execute and accomplish.
With him are strength and wisdom, which
in men are often parted. [2.] He gives him the glory of what he is to the world
of mankind. He has a universal influence and agency upon all the children of
men, and all their actions and affairs. Are the times changed? Is the posture of
affairs altered? Does every thing lie open to mutability? It is God that
changes
the times and the seasons, and the face of them. No change comes to pass by
chance, but according to the will and counsel of God. Are those that were kings
removed and deposed? Do they abdicate? Are they laid aside? It is God that
removes
kings. Are the
poor raised out of the dust, to be
set among
princes? It is God that
sets up kings; and the making and unmaking of
kings is a flower of his crown who is the fountain of all power,
King of
kings and Lord of lords. Are there men that excel others in wisdom,
philosophers and statesmen, that think above the common rate, contemplative
penetrating men? It is
God that gives wisdom to the wise, whether they be
so wise as to acknowledge it or no; they have it not of themselves, but it is he
that
gives knowledge to those that know understanding, which is a good
reason why we should not be proud of our knowledge, and why we should serve and
honour God with it and make it our business to know him. [3.] He gives him the
glory of this particular discovery. He praises him,
First, For that he
could make such a discovery (v. 22):
He reveals the deep and secret things
which are hidden from the eyes of all living. It was he that revealed to man
what is true wisdom when none else could (Job 27:27, 28); it is he that reveals
things to come to his servants and prophets. He does himself perfectly discern
and distinguish that which is most closely and most industriously concealed, for
he will
bring into judgment every secret thing; the truth will be evident
in the great day. He
knows what is in the darkness, and what is done in
the darkness, for that
hides not from him, Ps. 139:11, 12.
The light
dwells with him, and he
dwells in the light (1 Tim. 6:16), and yet,
as to us, he
makes darkness his pavilion. Some understand it of the light
of prophecy and divine revelation, which dwells with God and is derived from
him; for he is the
Father of lights, of all lights; they are all at home
in him.
Secondly, For that he had made this discovery to him. Here he has
an eye to God as the
God of his fathers; for, though the Jews were now
captives in Babylon, yet they were
beloved for their father's sake. He
praises God, who is the fountain of wisdom and might, for the wisdom and might
he had given him, wisdom to know this great secret and might to bear the
discovery. Note, What wisdom and might we have we must acknowledge to be God's
gift.
Thou hast made this known to me, v. 23. What was hidden from the
celebrated Chaldeans, who made the interpreting of dreams their profession, is
revealed to Daniel, a captive-Jew, a babe, much their junior. God would hereby
put honour upon the
Spirit of prophecy just when he was putting contempt
upon the
spirit of divination. Was Daniel thus thankful to God for making
known that to him which was the saving of the lives of him and his fellows? Much
more reason have we to be thankful to him for making known to us the great
salvation of the soul, to us and
not to the world, to us and
not to
the wise and prudent.
(2.) The respect he puts upon his companions in this
thanksgiving. Though it was by his prayers principally that this discovery was
obtained, and to him that it was made, yet he owns their partnership with him,
both in praying for it (it is what
we desired of thee) and in enjoying itThou
hast
made known unto us the king's matter. Either they were present
with Daniel when the discovery was made to him, or as soon as he knew it he told
it them (
heureµka, heureµka
I
have found it, I have found it), that those who had assisted him with their
prayers might assist him in their praises; his joining them with him is an
instance of his humility and modesty, which well become those that are taken
into communion with God. Thus St. Paul sometimes joins Sylvanus, Timotheus, or
some other minister, with himself in the inscriptions to many of his epistles.
Note, What honour God puts upon us we should be willing that our brethren may
share with us in.
Verses 24-30
We have here the introduction to Daniel's declaring the dream,
and the interpretation of it.
I. He immediately bespoke the reversing of the sentence against
the wise men of Babylon, v. 24. He went with all speed to Arioch, to tell him
that his commission was now superseded:
Destroy not the wise men of Babylon.
Though there were those of them perhaps that deserved to die, as magicians, by
the law of God, yet here that which they stood condemned for was not a crime
worth of death or of bonds, and therefore let them not die, and be
unjustly
destroyed, but let them live, and be justly shamed, as having been
nonplussed and unable to do that which a prophet of the Lord could do. Note,
Since God shows common kindness to the evil and good, we should do so too, and
be ready to save the lives of even bad men, Mt. 5:45. A good man is a common
good. To Paul in the ship God gave the souls of all that sailed with him; they
were saved for his sake. To Daniel was owing the preservation of all the wise
men, who yet rendered not according to the benefit done to them, ch. 3:8.
II. He offered his service, with great assurance, to go to the
king, and tell him his dream and the interpretation of it, and was admitted
accordingly, v. 24, 25. Arioch brought him in haste to the king, hoping to
ingratiate himself by introducing Daniel; he pretends he had sought him to
interpret the king's dream, whereas really it was to execute upon him the king's
sentence that he sought him. But courtiers' business is every way to humour
the prince and make their own services acceptable.
III. He contrived as much as might be to reflect shame upon the
magicians, and to give honour to God, upon this occasion. The king owned that it
was a bold undertaking, and questioned whether he could make it good (v. 26):
Art
thou able to make known unto me the dream? What! Such a babe in this
knowledge, such a stripling as thou are, wilt thou undertake that which thy
seniors despair of doing? The less likely it appeared to the king that Daniel
should do this the more God was glorified in enabling him to do it. Note, In
transmitting divine revelation to the children of men it has been God's usual
way to make use of the
weak and foolish things and persons
of the
world, and such as were
despised and despaired of,
to confound the
wise and mighty, that the excellency of the power might be of him, 1 Co.
1:27, 28. Daniel from this takes occasion, 1. To put the king out of conceit
with his magicians and soothsayers, whom he had such great expectations from (v.
27):
"This secret they cannot show to the king; it is out of their
power; the rules of their art will not reach to it. Therefore let not the king
be angry with them for not doing that which they cannot do; but rather despise
them, and cast them off, because they cannot do it." Broughton reads it
generally: "This secret
no sages, astrologers, enchanters, or entrail-cookers,
can show unto the king; let not the king therefore consult them any more."
Note, The experience we have of the inability of all creatures to give us
satisfaction should lessen our esteem of them, and lower our expectations from
them. They are baffled in their pretensions; we are baffled in our hopes from
them. Hitherto they come, and no further; let us therefore say to them, as Job
to his friends,
Now you are nothing; miserable comforters are you all. 2.
To bring him to the knowledge of the one only living and true God, the God whom
Daniel worshipped: "Though they cannot find out the secret, let not the
king despair of having it found out, for
there is a God in heaven that
reveals secrets," v. 28. Note, The insufficiency of creatures should
drive us to the all-sufficiency of the Creator.
There is a God in heaven
(and it is well for us there is) who can do that for us, and make known that to
us, which none on earth can, particularly the secret history of the work of
redemption and the secret designs of God's love to us therein, the mystery
which was
hidden from ages and generations; divine revelation helps us
out where human reason leaves us quite at a loss, and makes known that, not only
to kings, but to the poor of this world, which none of the philosophers or
politicians of the heathens, with all their oracles and arts of divination to
help them, could ever pretend to give us any light into, Rom. 16:25, 26.
IV. He confirmed the king in his opinion that the dream he was
thus solicitous to recover the idea of was really well worth enquiring after,
that it was of great value and of vast consequence, not a common dream, the idle
disport of a ludicrous and luxuriant fancy, which was not worth remembering or
telling again, but that it was a divine discovery, a ray of light darted into
his mind from the upper world, relating to the great affairs and revolutions of
this lower world. God in it
made known to the king what should be in the
latter days (v. 28), that is, in the times that were to come, reaching as
far as the setting up of Christ's kingdom in the world, which was to be
in
the latter days, Heb. 1:1. And again (v. 29):
"The thoughts which
came into thy mind were not the repetitions of what had been before, as our
dreams usually are"
Omnia quae sensu volvuntur vota diurno
Tempore sopito reddit amica quies
The sentiments which we indulge throughout the day
often mingle with the grateful slumbers of the night.
Claudian
"But they were predictions of
what should come to pass
hereafter, which he that
reveals secrets makes known unto thee; and
therefore thou art in the right in taking the hint and pursuing it thus."
Note, Things that are to come to pass hereafter are secret things, which God
only can reveal; and what he has revealed of those things, especially with
reference to the last days of all, to the end of time, ought to be very
seriously and diligently enquired into and considered by every one of us. Some
think that the
thoughts which are said to have come into the king's
mind upon his bed, what should come to pass hereafter, were his own thoughts
when he was awake. Just before he fell asleep, and dreamed this dream, he was
musing in his own mind what would be the issue of his growing greatness, what
his kingdom would hereafter come to; and so the dream was an answer to those
thoughts. What discoveries God intends to make he thus prepares men for.
V. He solemnly professes that he could not pretend to have
merited from God the favour of this discovery, or to have obtained it by any
sagacity of his own (v. 30):
"But, as for me, this secret is not
found out by me, but is
revealed to me, and that
not for any wisdom
that I have more than any living, to qualify me for the receiving of such a
discovery." Note, It well becomes those whom God has highly favoured and
honoured to be very humble and low in their own eyes, to lay aside all opinion
of their own wisdom and worthiness, that God alone may have all the praise of
the good they are, and have, and do, and that all may be attributed to the
freeness of his good-will towards them and the fulness of his good work in them.
The secret was made known to him not for his own sake, but, 1. For the sake of
his people, for
their sakes that shall make known the interpretation to the
king, that is, for the sake of his brethren and companions in tribulation,
who had by their prayers helped him to obtain this discovery, and so might be
said to make known the interpretationthat their lives might be spared, that
they might come into favour and be preferred, and all the people of the Jews
might fare the better, in their captivity, for their sakes. Note, Humble men
will be always ready to think that what God does for them and by them is more
for the sake of others than for their own. 2. For the sake of
his prince;
and some read the former clause in this sense, "Not for any wisdom of mine,
but that the king may know the interpretation, and that thou mightest know
the thoughts of thy heart, that thou mightest have satisfaction given thee
as to what thou wast before considering, and thereby instruction given thee how
to behave towards the church of God." God revealed this thing to Daniel
that he might make it known to the king. Prophets receive that they may give,
that the discoveries made to them may not be lodged with themselves, but
communicated to the persons that are concerned.
Verses 31-45
Daniel here gives full satisfaction to Nebuchadnezzar concerning
his dream and the interpretation of it. That great prince had been kind to this
poor prophet in his maintenance and education; he had been brought up at the
king's cost, preferred at court, and the land of his captivity had hereby been
made much easier to him than to others of his brethren. And now the king is
abundantly repaid for all the expense he had been at upon him; and for receiving
this prophet, though not in the name of a prophet, he had a prophet's reward,
such a reward as a prophet only could give, and for which that wealthy mighty
prince was now glad to be beholden to him. Here is,
I. The dream itself, v. 31, 45. Nebuchadnezzar perhaps was an
admirer of statues, and had his palace and gardens adorned with them; however,
he was a worshipper of images, and now behold a
great image is set before
him in a dream, which might intimate to him what the images were which he
bestowed so much cost upon, and paid such respect to; they were mere dreams. The
creatures of fancy might do as well to please the fancy. By the power of
imagination he might shut his eyes, and represent to himself what forms he
thought fit, and beautify them at his pleasure, without the expense and trouble
of sculpture. This was the image of a man erect:
It stood before him, as
a living man; and, because those monarchies which were designed to be
represented by it were admirable in the eyes of their friends, the
brightness
of this image
was excellent; and because they were formidable to their
enemies, and dreaded by all about them, the
form of this image is said to
be
terrible; both the features of the face and the postures of the body
made it so. But that which was most remarkable in this image was the different
metals of which it was composedthe
head of gold (the richest and most
durable metal), the
breast and arms of silver (the next to it in worth),
the
belly and sides (or thighs) of brass, the
legs of iron (still
baser metals), and lastly the feet
part of iron and part of clay. See
what the things of this world are; the further we go in them the less valuable
they appear. In the life of a man youth is a head of gold, but it grows less and
less worthy of our esteem; and old age is half clay; a man is then
as good as
dead. It is so with the world; later ages degenerate. The first age of the
Christian church, of the reformation, was a head of gold; but we live in an age
that is iron and clay. Some allude to this in the description of a hypocrite,
whose practice is not agreeable to his knowledge. He has a head of gold, but
feet of iron and clay: he knows his duty, but does it not. Some observe that in
Daniel's visions the monarchies were represented by four beasts (ch. 7), for
he looked upon that wisdom from beneath, by which they were turned to be earthly
and sensual, and a tyrannical power, to have more in it of the beast than of the
man, and so the vision agreed with his notions of the thing. But to
Nebuchadnezzar, a heathen prince, they were represented by a gay and pompous
image of a man, for he was an admirer of the
kingdoms of this world and the
glory of them. To him the sight was so charming that he was impatient to see
it again. But what became of this image? The next part of the dream shows it to
us calcined, and brought to nothing. He saw a stone cut out of the quarry by an
unseen power, without hands, and this stone fell upon the
feet of the image,
that were of
iron and clay, and
broke them to pieces; and then the
image must fall of course, and so the gold, and silver, and brass, and iron,
were all broken to pieces together, and beaten so small that they became like
the
chaff of the summer threshing-floors, and there were not to be found
any the least remains of them; but the stone
cut out of the mountain
became itself a
great mountain, and filled the earth. See how God can
bring about great effects by weak and unlikely causes; when he pleases a
little
one shall become a thousand. Perhaps the destruction of this image of gold,
and silver, and brass, and iron, might be intended to signify the abolishing of
idolatry out of the world in due time. The
idols of the heathen are silver
and gold, as this image was, and
they shall perish from off the earth and
from under these heavens, Jer. 10:11.; Isa. 2:18. And whatever power
destroys idolatry is in the ready way to magnify and exalt itself, as this
stone, when it had broken the image to pieces, became a great mountain.
II. The interpretation of this dream. Let us now see what is the
meaning of this. It was from God, and therefore from him it is fit that we take
the explication of it. It should seem, Daniel had his fellows with him, and
speaks for them as well as for himself, when he says,
We will tell the
interpretation, v. 36. Now,
1. This image represented the kingdoms of the earth that should
successively bear rule among the nations and have influence on the affairs of
the Jewish church. The four monarchies were not represented by four distinct
statues, but by one image, because they were all of one and the same spirit and
genius, and all more or less against the church. It was the same power, only
lodged in four different nations, the two former lying eastward of Judea, the
two latter westward. (1.) The
head of gold signified the Chaldean
monarchy, which was now in being (v. 37, 38):
Thou, O king! art (or
rather,
shalt be)
a king of kings, a universal monarch, to whom
many kings and kingdoms shall be tributaries; or, Thou art the
highest of
kings on earth at this time (as a
servant of servants is the meanest
servant); thou dost outshine all other kings. But let him not attribute his
elevation to his own politics or fortitude. No; it is
the God of heaven
that has
given thee a kingdom, power, and strength, and glory, a kingdom
that exercises great authority, stands firmly, and shines brightly, acts by a
puissant army with an arbitrary power. Note, The greatest of princes have no
power but what is given them from above. The extent of his dominion is set forth
(v. 38), that
wheresoever the children of men dwell, in all the nations
of that part of the world, he was
ruler over them all, over them and all
that belonged to them, all their cattle, not only those which they had a
property in, but those that were
ferae naturae
wild, the
beasts
of the field and
the fowls of the heaven. He was lord of all the
woods, forests, and chases, and none were allowed to hunt or fowl without his
leave. Thus
"thou art the head of gold; thou, and thy son, and thy
son's son, for seventy years." Compare this with Jer. 25:9, 11,
especially Jer. 27:5-7. There were other powerful kingdoms in the world at this
time, as that of the Scythians; but it was the kingdom of Babylon that reigned
over the Jews, and that began the government which continued in the succession
here described till Christ's time. It is called a
head, for its wisdom,
eminency, and absolute power, a head of
gold for its wealth (Isa. 14:4);
it was a golden city. Some make this monarchy to begin in Nimrod, and so bring
into it all the Assyrian kings, about fifty monarchs in all, and compute that it
lasted above 1600 years. But it had not been so long a monarchy of such vast
extent and power as is here described, nor any thing like it; therefore others
make only Nebuchadnezzar, Evil-merodach, and Belshazzar, to belong to this
head
of gold; and a glorious high throne they had, and perhaps exercised a more
despotic power than any of the kings that went before them. Nebuchadnezzar
reigned forty-five years current, Evil-merodach twenty-three years current, and
Belshazzar three. Babylon was their metropolis, and Daniel was with them upon
the spot during the seventy years. (2.) The
breast and arms of silver
signified the monarchy of the Medes and Persians, of which the king is told no
more than this,
There shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee (v.
39), not so rich, powerful, or victorious. This kingdom was founded by Darius
the Mede and Cyrus the Persian, in alliance with each other, and therefore
represented by two arms, meeting in the breast. Cyrus was himself a Persian by
his father, a Mede by his mother. Some reckon that this second monarchy lasted
130 years, others 204 years. The former computation agrees best with the
scripture chronology. (3.) The
belly and thighs of brass signified the
monarchy of the Grecians, founded by Alexander, who conquered Darius Codomannus,
the last of the Persian emperors. This is the
third kingdom, of brass,
inferior in wealth and extent of dominion to the Persian monarchy, but in
Alexander himself it shall by the power of the sword
bear rule over all the
earth; for Alexander boasted that he had conquered the world, and then sat
down and wept because he had not another world to conquer. (4.) The
legs and
feet of iron signified the Roman monarchy. Some make this to signify the
latter part of the Grecian monarchy, the two empires of Syria and Egypt, the
former governed by the family of the Seleucidae, from Seleucus, the latter by
that of the Lagidae, from Ptolemaeus Lagus; these they make the two legs and
feet of this image: Grotius, and Junius, and Broughton, go this way. But it has
been the more received opinion that it is the Roman monarchy that is here
intended, because it was in the time of that monarchy, and when it was at its
height, that the kingdom of Christ was set up in the world by the preaching of
the everlasting gospel. The Roman kingdom was strong as iron (v. 40), witness
the prevalency of that kingdom against all that contended with it for many ages.
That kingdom
broke in pieces the Grecian empire and afterwards quite
destroyed the nation of the Jews. Towards the latter end of the Roman monarchy
it grew very weak, and branched into ten kingdoms, which were as the toes of
these feet. Some of these were weak as clay, others strong as iron, v. 42.
Endeavours were used to unite and cement them for the strengthening of the
empire, but in vain:
They shall not cleave one to another, v. 43. This
empire divided the government for a long time between the senate and the people,
the nobles and the commons, but they did not entirely coalesce. There were civil
wars between Marius and Sylla, Caesar and Pompey, whose parties were as iron and
clay. Some refer this to the declining times of that empire, when, for the
strengthening of the empire against the irruptions of the barbarous nations, the
branches of the royal family intermarried; but the politics had not the desired
effect, when the day of the fall of that empire came.
2. The stone
cut out without hands represented the
kingdom of Jesus Christ, which should be set up in the world in the time of the
Roman empire, and upon the ruins of Satan's kingdom in the
kingdoms of the
world. This is
the stone cut out of the mountain without hands, for
it should be neither raised nor supported by human power or policy; no visible
hand should act in the setting of it up, but it should be done invisibly the
Spirit
of the Lord of hosts. This was
the stone which the builders refused,
because it was not cut out by their hands, but it has now become the
head-stone
of the corner. (1.) The gospel-church is a kingdom, which Christ is the sole
and sovereign monarch of, in which he rules by his word and Spirit, to which he
gives protection and law, and from which he receives homage and tribute. It is a
kingdom
not of this world, and yet set up in it; it is the kingdom of God
among men. (2.) The
God of heaven was to set up this kingdom, to give
authority to Christ to execute judgment, to set him as
King upon his holy
hill of Zion, and to bring into obedience to him a willing people. Being set
up by the God of heaven, it is often in the
New Testament called the
kingdom
of heaven, for its original is from above and its tendency is upwards. (3.)
It was to be set up
in the days of these kings, the kings of the fourth
monarchy, of which particular notice is taken (Lu. 2:1), That Christ was born
when, by the decree of the emperor of Rome,
all the world was taxed,
which was a plain indication that that empire had become as universal as any
earthly empire ever was. When these kings are contesting with each other, and in
all the struggles each of the contending parties hopes to find its own account,
God will do his own work and fulfil his own counsels.
These kings are all
enemies to Christ's kingdom, and yet it shall be set up in defiance of them.
(4.) It is a kingdom that knows no decay, is in no danger of destruction, and
will not admit any succession or revolution. It shall
never be destroyed
by any foreign force invading it, as many other kingdoms are; fire and sword
cannot waste it; the combined powers of earth and hell cannot deprive either the
subjects of their prince or the prince of his subjects; nor shall this
kingdom
be left to other people, as the kingdoms of the earth are. As Christ is a
monarch that has no successor (for he himself shall reign for ever), so his
kingdom is a monarchy that has no revolution. The kingdom of God was indeed
taken from the Jews and given to the Gentiles (Mt. 21:43), but still it was
Christianity that ruled, the kingdom of the Messiah. The Christian church is
still the same; it is fixed on a rock, much fought against, but never to be
prevailed against, by the gates of hell. (5.) It is a kingdom that shall be
victorious over all opposition. It shall
break in pieces and consume all
those kingdoms, as the
stone cut out of the mountain without hands
broke in pieces the image, v. 44, 45. The kingdom of Christ shall
wear out
all other kingdoms, shall outlive them, and flourish when they are sunk with
their own weight, and so wasted that their place
knows them no more. All
the kingdoms that appear against the kingdom of Christ shall be broken with a
rod
of iron, as a
potter's vessel, Ps. 2:9. And in the kingdoms that
submit to the kingdom of Christ tyranny, and idolatry, and every thing that is
their reproach, shall, as far as the gospel of Christ gets ground, be broken.
The day is coming when Jesus Christ shall have
put down all rule,
principality, and power, and have made
all his enemies his footstool;
and then this prophecy will have its full accomplishment, and not till then, 1
Co. 15:24, 25. Our savior seems to refer to this (Mt. 21:44), when, speaking of
himself as the stone set at nought by the Jewish builders, he says,
On
whomsoever this stone
shall fall, it will grind him to powder. (6.)
It shall be an everlasting kingdom. Those kingdoms of the earth that had
broken
in pieces all about them at length came, in their turn, to be in like manner
broken; but the kingdom of Christ shall break other kingdoms in pieces and shall
itself
stand for ever. His throne shall be as the days of heaven, his
seed, his subjects, as the stars of heaven, not only so innumerable, but so
immutable. Of the
increase of Christ's
government and peace
there shall be
no end. The Lord shall reign for ever, not only to the end
of time, but when time and days shall be no more, and God
shall be all in all
to eternity.
III. Daniel having thus interpreted the dream, to the
satisfaction of Nebuchadnezzar, who gave him no interruption, so full was the
interpretation that he had no question to ask, and so plain that he had no
objection to make, he closes all with a solemn assertion, 1. Of the divine
original of this dream:
The great God (so he calls him, to express his
own high thoughts of him, and to beget the like in the mind of this great king)
has
made known to the king what shall come to pass hereafter, which the
gods of the magicians could not do. And thus a full confirmation was given to
that great argument which Isaiah had long before urged against idolaters, and
particularly the idolaters of Babylon, when he challenged the gods they
worshipped to
show things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that
you are gods (Isa. 41:23), and by
this proved the God of Israel to be
the true God, that he
declares the end from the beginning, Isa. 46:10. 2.
Of the undoubted certainty of the things foretold by this dream. He who makes
known these things is the same that has himself designed and determined them,
and will by his providence effect them; and we are sure that
his counsel
shall stand, and cannot be altered, and therefore
the dream is certain
and the interpretation thereof sure. Note, Whatever God has made known we
may depend upon.
Verses 46-49
One might have expected that when Nebuchadnezzar was contriving
to make his own kingdom everlasting he would be enraged at Daniel, who foretold
the fall of it and that another kingdom of another nature should be the
everlasting kingdom; but, instead of resenting it as an affront, he received it
as an oracle, and here we are told what the expressions were of the impressions
it made upon him. 1. He was ready to look upon Daniel as a little god. Though he
saw him to be a man, yet from this wonderful discovery which he had made both of
his secret thoughts, in telling him the dream, and of things to come, in telling
him the interpretation of it, he concluded that he had certainly a divinity
lodged in him, worthy his adoration; and therefore he
fell upon his face and
worshipped Daniel, v. 46. It was the custom of the country by prostration to
give honour to kings, because they have something of a divine power in them
(I
have said, You are gods); and therefore this king, who had often received
such veneration from others, now paid the like to Daniel, whom he supposed to
have in him a divine knowledge, which he was so struck with an admiration of
that he could not contain himself, but forgot both that Daniel was a man and
that himself was a king. Thus did God magnify divine revelation
and make it
honourable, extorting from a proud potentate such a veneration but for one
glimpse of it. He
worshipped Daniel, and
commanded that they should
offer an oblation to him, and burn incense. Herein he cannot be justified,
but may in some measure be excused, when Cornelius was thus ready to worship
Peter, and John the angel, who both knew better. But, though it is not here
mentioned, yet we have reason to think that Daniel refused these honours that he
paid him, and said, as Peter to Cornelius,
Stand up, I myself also am a man,
or, as the angel to St. John,
See thou do it not; for it is not said that
the oblation was offered unto him, though the king commanded it, or rather
said
it, for so the word is. He said, in his haste,
Let an oblation be offered
to him. And that Daniel did say something to him which turned his eyes and
thoughts another way is intimated in what follows (v. 47),
The king answered
Daniel. Note, It is possible for those to express a great honour for the
ministers of God's word who yet have no true love for the word.
Herod
feared John, and
heard him gladly, and yet went on in his sins, Mk.
6:20. 2. He readily acknowledged the God of Daniel to be the great God, the true
God, the only living and true God. If Daniel will not suffer himself to be
worshipped, he will (as Daniel, it is likely, directed him)
worship God,
by confessing (v. 47),
Of a truth your God is a God of gods, such a God
as there is no other, above all gods in dignity, over all gods in dominion. He
is a Lord
of kings, from whom they derive their power and to whom they
are accountable; and he is both a discoverer and a
revealer of secrets;
what is most secret he sees and can reveal, and what he has revealed is what was
secret and which none but himself could reveal, 1 Co. 2:10. 3. He preferred
Daniel, made him a great man, v. 48. God made him a great man indeed when he
took him into communion with himself, a greater man than Nebuchadnezzar could
make him; but, because God had magnified him, therefore the king magnified him.
Does wealth make men great? The king
gave him many great gifts; and he
had no reason to refuse them, when they all put him into so much the greater
capacity of doing good to his brethren in captivity. These gifts were grateful
returns for the good services he had done, and not aimed at, nor bargained for,
by him, as the rewards of divination were by Balaam. Does power make a man
great? He made him
ruler over the whole province of Babylon, which no
doubt had great influence upon the other provinces; he made him likewise
chancellor of the university,
chief of the governors over all the wise men of
Babylon, to instruct those whom he had thus outdone; and, since they could
not do what the king would have them do, they shall be obliged to do what Daniel
would have them do. Thus it is fit that the
fool should be servant to the
wise in heart. Seeing Daniel
could reveal this secret (v. 47), the
king thus advanced him. Note, It is the wisdom of princes to advance and employ
those who receive divine revelation, and are much conversant with it, who, as
Daniel here, show themselves to be well acquainted with the kingdom of heaven.
Joseph, like Daniel here, was advanced in the court of the king of Egypt for his
interpreting his dreams; and he called him
Zaphnath-paaneaha revealer of
secrets, as the king of Babylon here calls Daniel; so that the preambles to
their patents of honour are the samefor, and in consideration of, their good
services done to the crown in
revealing secrets. 4. He preferred his
companions for his sake, and upon his special instance and request, v. 49.
Daniel himself
sat in the gate of the king, as president of the council,
chief-justice, or prime-minister of state, or perhaps chamberlain of the
household; but he used his interest for his friends as became a good man, and
procured places in the government for Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego. Those
that helped him with their prayers shall share with him in his honours, such a
grateful sense had he even of that service. The preferring of them would be a
great stay and help to Daniel in his place and business. And these pious Jews,
being thus preferred in Babylon, had great opportunity of serving their brethren
in captivity, and of doing them many good offices, which no doubt they were
ready to do. Thus, sometimes, before God brings his people into trouble, he
prepares it, that it may be easy to them.
Chapter 2:
| Darby
| Geneva
| Gill
| Jamieson Faussett Brown
| Matthew Henry
| Matthew Henry Concise
| Wesley
| Index
| Bible Gateway |
Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ezekiel Hosea
Genesis
Exodus
Leviticus
Numbers
Deuteronomy
Joshua
Judges
Ruth
1 Samuel
2 Samuel
1 Kings
2 Kings
1 Chronicles
2 Chronicles
Ezra
Nehemiah
Esther
Job
Psalm
Proverbs
Ecclesiastes
Song of Solomon
Isaiah
Jeremiah
Lamentations
Ezekiel
Daniel
Hosea
Joel
Amos
Obadiah
Jonah
Micah
Nahum
Habakkuk
Zephaniah
Haggai
Zechariah
Malachi
Matthew
Mark
Luke
John
Acts
Romans
1 Corinthians
2 Corinthians
Galatians
Ephesians
Philippians
Colossians
1 Thessalonians
2 Thessalonians
1 Timothy
2 Timothy
Titus
Philemon
Hebrews
James
1 Peter
2 Peter
1 John
2 John
3 John
Jude
Revelation
Classic Bible CommentariesCourtesy of E-Word Today
Copyright 2000-2009 BibleClassics.com
