Chapter 4:
| Darby
| Geneva
| Gill
| Jamieson Faussett Brown
| Matthew Henry
| Matthew Henry Concise
| Wesley
| Index
| Bible Gateway |
Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Exodus Numbers
Leviticus 4
Complete Concise
This chapter is concerning the sin-offering, which was properly
intended to make atonement for a sin committed through ignorance, I. By the
priest himself (v. 1-12). Or, II. By the whole congregation (v. 13-21). Or,
III. By a ruler (v. 22-26). Or, IV. By a private person (v. 27, etc.).
Verses 1-12
The laws contained in the first three chapters seem to have been
delivered to Moses at one time. Here begin the statutes of another session,
another day. From the throne of glory between the cherubim God delivered these
orders. And he enters now upon a subject more strictly new than those before.
Burnt-offerings, meat-offerings, and peace-offerings, it should seem, had been
offered before the giving of the law upon mount Sinai; those sacrifices the
patriarchs had not been altogether unacquainted with (Gen. 8:20; Ex. 20:24), and
in them they had respect to sin, to make atonement for it, Job 1:5. But the law
being now added
because of transgressions (Gal. 3:19), and having
entered, that eventually
the offence might abound (Rom. 5:20), they were
put into a way of making atonement for sin more particularly by sacrifice, which
was (more than any of the ceremonial institutions)
a shadow of good things to
come, but the substance is Christ, and that one offering of himself by which
he put away sin and
perfected for ever those who are sanctified.
I. The general case supposed we have, v. 2. Here observe, 1.
Concerning sin in general, that it is described to be against
any of the
commandments of the Lord; for
sin is the transgression of the law,
the divine law. The wits or wills of men, their inventions or their injunctions,
cannot make that to be sin which the law of God has not made to be so. It is
said likewise,
if a soul sin, for it is not sin if it be not some way or
other the soul's act; hence it is called the
sin of the soul (Mic.
6:7), and it is the soul that is injured by it, Prov. 8:36. 2. Concerning the
sins for which those offerings were appointed. (1.) They are supposed to be
overt acts; for, had they been required to bring a sacrifice for every sinful
thought or word, the task had been endless. Atonement was made for those in the
gross, on the day of expiation, once a year; but these are said to be done
against the commandments. (2.) They are supposed to be sins of commission,
things which ought not to be done. Omissions are sins, and must come into
judgment; but what had been omitted at one time might be done at another, and so
to obey was better than sacrifice: but a commission was past recall. (3.) They
are supposed to be sins committed through ignorance. If they were done
presumptuously, and with an avowed contempt of the law and the Law-maker, the
offender was to be cut off, and there remained
no sacrifice for the sin,
Heb. 10:26, 27; Num. 15:30. But if the offender were either ignorant of the law,
as in divers instances we may suppose many were (so numerous and various were
the prohibitions), or were surprised into the sin unawares, the circumstances
being such as made it evident that his resolution against the sin was sincere,
but that he was overtaken in it, as the expression is (Gal. 6:1), in this case
relief was provided by the remedial law of the sin-offering. And the Jews say,
"Those crimes only were to be expiated by sacrifice, if committed
ignorantly, for which the criminal was to have been cut off if they had been
committed presumptuously."
II. The law begins with the case of the anointed priest, that
is, the high priest, provided he should sin through ignorance; for
the law
made men priests who had infirmity. Though his ignorance was of all others
least excusable, yet he was allowed to bring his offering. His office did not so
far excuse his offence as that it should be forgiven him without a sacrifice;
yet it did not so far aggravate it but that it should be forgiven him when he
did bring his sacrifice. If he sin
according to the sin of the people (so
the case is put, v. 3), which supposes him in this matter to stand upon the
level with other Israelites, and to have no benefit of his clergy at all. Now
the law concerning the sin-offering for the high priest is, 1. That he must
bring a bullock without blemish for a sin-offering (v. 3), as valuable an
offering as that for the whole congregation (v. 14); whereas for any other
ruler, or a common person,
a kid of the goats should serve, v. 23, 28.
This intimated the greatness of the guilt connected with the sin of a high
priest. The eminency of his station, and his relation both to God and to the
people, greatly aggravated his offences; see Rom. 2:21. 2. The hand of the
offerer must be laid upon the head of the offering (v. 4), with a solemn
penitent confession of the sin he had committed, putting it upon the head of the
sin-offering, ch. 16:21. No remission without confession, Ps. 32:5; Prov. 28:13.
It signified also a confidence in this instituted way of expiating guilt, as a
figure of something better yet to come, which they could not stedfastly discern.
He that laid his hand on the head of the beast thereby owned that he deserved to
die himself, and that it was God's great mercy that he would please to accept
the offering of this beast to die for him. The Jewish writers themselves say
that neither the sin-offering nor the trespass-offering made atonement, except
for those that repented and believed in their atonement. 3. The bullock must be
killed, and a great deal of solemnity there must be in disposing of the blood;
for it was
the blood that made atonement, and
without shedding of
blood there was
no remission, v. 5-7. Some of the blood of the
high-priest's sin-offering was to be
sprinkled seven times before the veil,
with an eye towards the mercy-seat, though it was veiled: some of it was to be
put upon the horns of the golden altar, because at that altar the priest himself
ministered; and thus was signified the putting away of that pollution which from
his sins did cleave to his services. It likewise serves to illustrate the
influence which Christ's satisfaction has upon the prevalency of his
intercession. The blood of his sacrifice is put upon the altar of his incense
and sprinkled before the Lord. When this was done the remainder of the blood was
poured at the foot of the brazen altar. By this rite, the sinner acknowledged
that he deserved to have his blood thus poured out like water. It likewise
signified the pouring out of the soul before God in true repentance, and
typified our Saviour's
pouring out his soul unto death. 4. The fat of
the inwards was to be burnt upon the altar of burnt-offering, v. 8-10. By this
the intention of the offering and of the atonement made by it was directed to
the glory of God, who, having been dishonoured by the sin, was thus honoured by
the sacrifice. It signified the sharp sufferings of our Lord Jesus, when he was
made sin (that is, a sin-offering) for us, especially the sorrows of his soul
and his inward agonies. It likewise teaches us, in conformity to the death of
Christ, to crucify the flesh. 5. The head and body of the beast, skin and all,
were to be carried
without the camp, to a certain place appointed for
that purpose, and there burnt to ashes, v. 11, 12. This was very significant,
(1.) Of the duty of repentance, which is the putting away of sin as a detestable
thing, which our soul hates. True penitents say to their idols, "Get you
hence; what have we to do any more with idols?" The sin-offering is called
sin.
What they did to that we must do to our sins; the body of sin must be destroyed,
Rom. 6:6. (2.) Of the privilege of remission. When God pardons sin he quite
abolishes it, casts it behind his back.
The iniquity of Judah shall be sought
for and not found. The apostle takes particular notice of this ceremony, and
applies it to Christ (Heb. 13:11-13), who suffered without the gate, in the
place of a skull, where the ashes of dead men, as those of the altar, were
poured out.
Verses 13-21
This is the law for expiating the guilt of a national sin, by a
sin offering. If the leaders of the people, through mistake concerning the law,
caused them to err, when the mistake was discovered an offering must be brought,
that wrath might not come upon the whole congregation. Observe, 1. It is
possible that the church may err, and that her guides may mislead her. It is
here supposed that the whole congregation may sin, and sin through ignorance.
God will always have a church on earth; but he never said it should be
infallible, or perfectly pure from corruption on this side heaven. 2. When a
sacrifice was to be offered for the whole congregation, the elders were to lay
their hands upon the head of it (three of them at least), as representatives of
the people and agents for them. The sin we suppose to have been some common
custom, taken up and used by the generality of the people, upon presumption of
its being lawful, which afterwards, upon search, appeared to be otherwise. In
this case the commonness of the usage received perhaps by tradition from their
fathers, and the vulgar opinion of its being lawful, would not so far excuse
them from sin but that they must bring a sacrifice to make atonement for it.
There are many bad customs and forms of speech which are thought to have no harm
in them, and yet may bring guilt and wrath upon a land, which therefore it
concerns the elders both to reform and to intercede with God for the pardon of,
Joel 2:16. 3. The blood of this sin-offering, as of the former, was to be
sprinkled
seven times before the Lord, v. 17. It was not to be poured out there, but
sprinkled only; for the cleansing virtue of the blood of Christ was then and
still is sufficiently signified and represented by sprinkling, Isa. 52:15. It
was to be sprinkled seven times. Seven is a number of perfection, because when
God had made the world in six days he rested the seventh; so this signified the
perfect satisfaction Christ made, and the complete cleansing of the souls of the
faithful by it; see Heb. 10:14. The blood was likewise to be put upon the horns
of the incense-altar, to which there seems to be an allusion in Jer. 17:1, where
the sin of Judah is said to be
graven upon the horns of their altars. If
they did not forsake their sins, the putting of the blood of their sin-offerings
upon the horns of their altars, instead of taking away their guilt, did but bind
it on the faster, perpetuated the remembrance of it, and remained a witness
against them. It is likewise alluded to in Rev. 9:13, where a voice is heard
from
the four horns of the golden altar; that is, an answer of peace is given to
the prayers of the saints, which are acceptable and prevalent only by virtue of
the blood of the sin-offering put upon the horns of that altar; compare Rev.
8:3. 4. When the offering is completed, it is said,
atonement is made, and
the sin shall be forgiven, v. 20. The promise of remission is founded upon
the atonement. It is spoken here of the forgiveness of the sin of the whole
congregation, that is, the turning away of those national judgments which the
sin deserved. Note, The saving of churches and kingdoms from ruin is owing to
the satisfaction and mediation of Christ.
Verses 22-26
Observe here, 1. That God takes notice of and is displeased with
the sins of rulers. Those who have power to call others to account are
themselves accountable to the ruler of rulers; for, as high as they are, there
is a higher than they. This is intimated in that the commandment transgressed is
here said to be the
commandment of the Lord his God, v. 22. He is a
prince to others, but let him know the Lord is a God to him. 2. The sin of the
ruler which he committed through ignorance is supposed afterwards to come to his
knowledge (v. 23), which must be either by the check of his own conscience or by
the reproof of his friends, both which we should all, even the best and
greatest, not only submit to, but be thankful for. What we have done amiss we
should be very desirous to come to the knowledge of.
That which I see not,
teach thou me, and show me wherein I have erred, are prayers we should put
up to God every day, that though through ignorance we fall into sin we may not
through ignorance lie still in it. 3. The sin-offering for a ruler was to be
a
kid of the goats, not a bullock, as for the priest and the whole
congregation; nor was the blood of his sin-offering to be brought into the
tabernacle, as of the other two, but it was all bestowed upon the brazen altar
(v. 25); nor was the flesh of it to be burnt, as that of the other two, without
the camp, which intimated that the sin of a ruler, though worse than that of a
common person, yet was not so heinous, nor of such pernicious consequence, as
the sin of the high priest, or of the whole congregation. A kid of the goats was
sufficient to be offered for a ruler, but a bullock for a tribe, to intimate
that the ruler, though
major singulisgreater than each, was
minor
universisless than the whole. It is bad when great men give bad examples,
but worse when all men follow them. 4. It is promised that the atonement shall
be accepted and the sin forgiven (v. 26), that is, if he repent and reform; for
otherwise God swore concerning Eli, a judge in Israel, that the iniquity of his
house should not be purged with sacrifice nor offering for ever, 1 Sa. 3:14.
Verses 27-35
I. Here is the law of the sin-offering for a common person,
which differs from that for a ruler only in this, that a private person might
bring either a kid or a lamb, a ruler only a kid; and that for a ruler must be a
male, for the other a female: in all the circumstances of the management of the
offering they agreed. Observe, 1. The case supposed:
If any one of the common
people sin through ignorance, v. 27. The prophet supposes that they were not
so likely as the great men to
know the way of the Lord, and the judgment of
their God (Jer. 5:4), and yet, if they sin through ignorance, they must
bring a sin-offering. Note, Even sins of ignorance need to be atoned for by
sacrifice. To be able to plead, when we are charged with sin, that we did it
ignorantly, and through the surprise of temptation, will not bring us off if we
be not interested in that great plea,
Christ hath died, and entitled to
the benefit of that. We have all need to pray with David (and he was a ruler) to
be cleansed from
secret faults, the errors which we ourselves do not
understand or are not aware of, Ps. 19:12. 2. That the sins of ignorance
committed by a single person, a common obscure person, did require a sacrifice;
for, as the greatest are not above the censure, so the meanest are not below the
cognizance of the divine justice. None of the common people, if offenders, were
overlooked in a crowd. 3. That a sin-offering was not only admitted, but
accepted, even from one of the common people, and an atonement made by it, v.
31, 35. Here rich and poor, prince and peasant, meet together; they are both
alike welcome to Christ, and to an interest in his sacrifice, upon the same
terms. See Job 34:19.
II. From all these laws concerning the sin-offerings we may
learn, 1. To hate sin, and to watch against it. That is certainly a very bad
thing to make atonement for which so many innocent and useful creatures must be
slain and mangled thus. 2. To value Christ, the great and true sin-offering,
whose blood cleanses from all sin, which it was not possible that the
blood
of bulls and of goats should take away. Now, if any man sin, Christ is
the
propitiation (1 Jn. 2:1, 2), not for Jews only, but for Gentiles. And
perhaps there was some allusion to this law concerning sacrifices for sins of
ignorance in that prayer of Christ's, just when he was offering up himself a
sacrifice,
Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.
Chapter 4:
| Darby
| Geneva
| Gill
| Jamieson Faussett Brown
| Matthew Henry
| Matthew Henry Concise
| Wesley
| Index
| Bible Gateway |
Introduction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Exodus Numbers
Genesis
Exodus
Leviticus
Numbers
Deuteronomy
Joshua
Judges
Ruth
1 Samuel
2 Samuel
1 Kings
2 Kings
1 Chronicles
2 Chronicles
Ezra
Nehemiah
Esther
Job
Psalm
Proverbs
Ecclesiastes
Song of Solomon
Isaiah
Jeremiah
Lamentations
Ezekiel
Daniel
Hosea
Joel
Amos
Obadiah
Jonah
Micah
Nahum
Habakkuk
Zephaniah
Haggai
Zechariah
Malachi
Matthew
Mark
Luke
John
Acts
Romans
1 Corinthians
2 Corinthians
Galatians
Ephesians
Philippians
Colossians
1 Thessalonians
2 Thessalonians
1 Timothy
2 Timothy
Titus
Philemon
Hebrews
James
1 Peter
2 Peter
1 John
2 John
3 John
Jude
Revelation
Classic Bible CommentariesCourtesy of E-Word Today
Copyright 2000-2009 BibleClassics.com
